Welcome! This is a website that everyone can build together. It's easy!

Home

public transportationThis wiki is for creating intentional communities that address issues of sustainability and justice along ecological, social, economic, and political lines. These communities will be integrated with larger communities, movements, and society as a whole. They will also seek to expand and/or spawn other communities and will maintain a network for mutual support. These communities could have different primary focuses (residential, service or income production, networking, activism, etc.) but will seek to incorporate as many functions as possible.
- sky

This is an open forum which will reformat itself using the type of rolling democracy which is found in other wikis. There is another effort being made to build a more general purpose intentional community wiki which is at wiki.ic.org
- paxus



skybluestar
skybluestar
Latest page update: made by skybluestar , Oct 13 2007, 11:46 PM EDT (about this update About This Update skybluestar Edited by skybluestar

2 words added
1 word deleted

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)


Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
skybluestar a better name? 0 Oct 13 2007, 5:53 PM EDT by skybluestar
skybluestar
Thread started: Oct 13 2007, 5:53 PM EDT  Watch
anyone got an idea for a better, more exciting, creative, inspiring name for this wiki? ;0)
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
skybluestar emerging protocal? 0 Oct 13 2007, 5:44 PM EDT by skybluestar
skybluestar
Thread started: Oct 13 2007, 5:44 PM EDT  Watch
I notice that some contributors have been inclined towards adding content to pages, or creating new pages, and others towards making comments.

I want people to add content to pages and create new pages. What some started doing, which I just went back and completed, was signing content added to a page. I like this.

But is there some useful distinction between what should be added as content and what should be a comment? The rough trend I'm starting to see is that comments are more for tangental dialog or information (like the commetns on the home page about the purpose of this wiki compared to the ic.org wiki, this comment, as well as buckets comment giving detail about what the FEC is up to - though I think that could also have been page content).
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
skybluestar no, really, go wild 0 Oct 9 2007, 11:00 PM EDT by skybluestar
skybluestar
Thread started: Oct 9 2007, 11:00 PM EDT  Watch
just to reiterate, I don't want anything on this site to be "untouchable." I want disagreement, I want paradox, I want varying perspectives, I want all that richness and complexity. I don't want people to feel like they can't add or comment or insert, or whatever, because they might offend someone. Be considerate, cooperative, etc. but not at the expense of contributing.
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
skybluestar go wild 3 Oct 9 2007, 10:58 PM EDT by skybluestar
skybluestar
Thread started: Oct 9 2007, 2:48 PM EDT  Watch
I want this to grow in whatever direction has the most energy. If I don't like the direction it's going, I'll start something new. So go wild editing, inviting new people, etc.
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None
Show Last Reply
Recent Site Activity
Top Contributors